Ariel Pink's Haunted Graffiti
Worn Copy
A counter-current to the digitalization of everyday life, analogue fetishism became one of the defining developments of the 2000s. Entire micro-genres sprang up oriented around cassette releases with handcrafted packaging, there was a burgeoning antique market for modular synths, and a resurgence of vinyl took off that would lead to overpriced platters popping up in Whole Foods next to the artisanal soaps and organic almond butter.
Arriving smack in the middle of the decade, Worn Copy chimed with the emerging hip taste for the
distressed and faded - even when those
effects, as with Hipstamatic, were actually digital simulations of decay and
ageing.
The title Worn Copy had a particular reference,
drawing attention to Ariel’s means-of-production: the 8-track Yamaha MT8X
cassette-recorder. Where most of his DIY contemporaries used digital technology
to record and then released the results on “dead media” formats like vinyl or
cassette, Ariel’s process was analogue from the ground up. The Yamaha MT8X is a long discontinued piece
of equipment that – like the similar Tascam Portastudio – only existed for a
few years before digital technology made it obsolete. Rather than the 2-inch or
3-inch reel-to-reel tape used in professional recording studios, these home
studios recorded directly onto cassettes, where the tape was slightly wider
than an eighth of an inch. Your master tape was a C60, C90, even a C120 if you
were really cheapskate – something you could buy at Sam Goody or Radio Shack.
These were machines designed for amateur musicians looking
to teach themselves the rudiments of mixing and overdubbing, or for songwriters
and fledgling bands to record demos.
“The function, and appeal, of the Yamaha and Tascam, was that you had
the studio and the mixing desk in one,” explains Ariel. “You didn’t need to
have a reel-to-reel unit and a separate mixing board, and then another medium
to dub copies down to from the master tape. You could monitor and record on a
single machine.” Very convenient, but
the downside was a brutally reduced level of sound quality. The eight channels
of sound on the mixer got distributed as eight bands across tape far thinner
than the tape used in a recording studio. “Each band can’t process as much information, can’t take as much signal, without bleeding onto the other
tracks”.
Ariel gives me a glimpse of his archive of master tapes.
Rather than the film canister-like containers that word usually suggests, these
are scores – maybe hundreds – of decidedly cheapo-looking cassettes. Most appear
to be normal-bias (i.e. not the superior-grade chrome or metal tapes that hi-fi
listeners preferred). A few even look like pre-recorded cassettes that he taped
over. “I wanted to get the most bang for my buck,” Ariel laughs. You could improve the sound somewhat
by recording at double-speed… but the end result didn’t exactly sound like it
hailed from the Record Plant.
The paradox of Worn Copy and the other Ariel Pink’s
Haunted Graffiti albums of this era is that Ariel was using a preliminary
process to make a finished product, and further, that he was attempting to make
music with the layered arrangements and intricate production of, say, Tusk-era
Fleetwood Mac, using technology even more basic than what was available to DIY
pioneers like Swell Maps and Television Personalities (who at least got to see
the inside of a professional recording studio).
This gulf between ambition and means is heard most gloriously
on Worn Copy’s opener, “Trepanated Earth”, an 11-minute, multi-segmented
epic that swerves through style switches and crescendo upon crescendo,
resurrecting the bygone drama of a lost golden age of radio rock. “ I feel like it’s being transmitted from my
ears, being broadcast from 1979,” says Ariel. “Pomp and massiveness” was what
he was aiming for, he says. That and a feeling of unhinged, off-the-rails
momentum: “the nuance and the chemistry of a real band playing – a band at
their prime or at their most unleashed, when they had all their energy stirred
up and didn’t know what to do with it. In that song, I just wanted to do everything
at once – a real showcase of what I can do.”
“Like all the stuff in a way, ‘Trepanated Earth’ is intended
to catch someone off guard while they’re listening in a record store,” Ariel
continues. He puts on a nerdy-dude voice to impersonate the startled customer:
“’ Wooah, what is this, man! I’ve never heard this stuff before! What year
is it’s from?’” He deadpans the clerk’s voice - “It’s from this year” – and
then switches back to the customer’s stunned “What?!?”
A former record store clerk himself, Ariel effortlessly
breaks down the component stages of “Trepanated Earth”, connecting each section in turn to the theme
song of the TV sitcom ‘Full House,’ to the glassy guitar-chimes of English DIY
cult figure Martin Newell of The Cleaners from Venus, to Can’s slippery
bass-motion, to the raging guitar-thrash of Simply Saucer. But the whole
transcends its parts, and the raging conglomerate is truly transcendent –
possibly the most ecstatic rock blow-out of the 21st Century so far.
But what about that strange title?
“I looked it up in the dictionary but there’s no such word –
there’s ‘trepanned’ but not ‘trepanated.. I just liked the way it rolled off
the tongue.” Non-existent word or not, the title communicates a potent image:
just like primitive peoples boring holes in the skulls of persons we’d nowadays recognize as mentally ill, in order
to release evil spirits, you picture our
planet being perforated and unloosing black flaming clouds of psychotic energy.
It’s easy to imagine “Trepanated Earth” as an album cover – “a psychedelic
explosion” as Ariel puts it.
The song starts with Ariel’s guttural growls of misanthropy
– “the human race is a pile of dogshit”, “mankind is a Nazi”, “humanity is the
devil”, “do you really think I give a fuck about the world?” – offset by a
boyish, innocent alter-ego Ariel speaking about dream worlds and the power of the
imagination. This is a devil versus
angel shoulder scenario, Ariel explains. “They’re having a little dance, the
two voices, the two viewpoints.” Then “Trepanated” shifts into a love-hate
song. “It’s a schism between a couple – I’m just pleading, telling them I hate
their guts while I love their ass. It’s a kiss-off that’s also like a love
poem”.
“Immune To Emotion,” the next track on Worn Copy, is
the calm after the storm of “Trepanated”. But the serenity is only
surface-deep, a mask of impregnability. “That phrase just rolled off my tongue
really easily – it’s what I would have liked to have seemed to everybody. I’m
completely just bluffing. It’s a pose - ‘nothing’s going to ruffle this guy’ - but of course inside I’m a screaming manlet
who needs attention.”
“Life In LA” drops the bad-ass façade with the candid confession
that “life can be so lonely”. The melancholy mood is softened by a daffy
quacking refrain that recurs (Ariel vocally squawking melodic lines for his
clarinetist friend to follow and double) and by a syrupy golden sound that oozes
gorgeously over the entire song. “The wah pedal is introduced on Worn Copy
– that’s the effect du jour on all the songs. It gives ‘Life in LA’ that sort of fake-funky feeling. An
easy-listening, AM Gold vibe, like ‘Girlfriend;, that Paul McCartney song that
Michael Jackson sang. I picture palm trees, light reflecting off of
sun-blockers.” The mise en scene seems similar to Ariel’s later cover of
the Sixties pop-psych song “Bright Lit Blue Skies” – where the summer sunshine
feels like a lie to those exiled from happiness, who carry a cache of wintry
coldness inside them all year round.
There are lighter moments scattered all across Worn Copy.
Whimsies like “Jules Lost His Jewels”, the true story of Ariel’s cat getting
neutered because he sprayed over his girlfriend’s leg. The jaunty “Artifact” - a sort of sci-fi fable or message to his
future-self sent via song, laced with water-bong sounds. Bouncy comic cuts like “Credit,” with its
hilarious lyrics about how the game is rigged against consumers, and “The
Drummer”, a third-person veiled-autobiography
about “an anti-hero starting his own band,” who gets the chicks dancing to beats
played “with his tongue and his teeth”. “One On One” shimmers gorgeously like Can in
Afro-mode, the dreaminess offset by a lyric about an orgy: “Take your
neighbor’s hand / And throw them on the ground… Don’t fret if you’re going to
come / When you’re finished, get another one.”
Starting with a sample from obscure German psych-prog outfit Missus
Beastly, “Somewhere In Europe” is a spoof on Americans abroad that Ariel
compares to Clark Griswold in National Lampoon’s European Vacation.
There are also pure moments of aching near-abstract beauty –
the ambient caverns of “Foilly Foibles / GOLD”, a reverberant chamber redolent
of Miles Davis’s “He Loved Him Madly”, although Ariel’s own comparisons are Saucerful
of Secrets and Cluster. Or “Jagged Carnival Tours”, which Ariel describes
as “like some futuristic tunnel at Universal Studios in the Eighties”. This
noodling amorphousness is something that Ariel used to jam out by the yard, or
C120, reflecting his love of Sun Ra and ultra-obscure,
beyond-the-Nurse-With-Wound-List experimental oddballs.
Still, the heart of the album, as with all of Ariel’s work,
is the clash of opposed impulses: pop’s pleasing prettiness and shapely
structures, stained and shook by the sort of wounded / wounding emotions
that normally funnel themselves into
genres like death-metal, industrial and Goth.
The literary critic Randall Jarrell believed that you could take
any poet or writer’s work and boil it down to a handful of keywords that
crystalize the kernel, the creative matrix, of their vision. In Ariel’s case, way out in front, the
hands-down winner, would be “perverted”. That word and variants like “pervert”
and “perversion” crop up repeatedly in his conversation, serve as the go-to
adjective to describe his approach to processing sound, warping influences, and
writing lyrics, as well as his taste and his worldview.
“I think I’m a little bit perverted in my reasoning,” Ariel
muses. “I flip things on their head and re-encrust the diamond with coal, if
you get me. I pervert the meanings of things, I pervert the sacred. I profane
things – but in a really G-rated way. I’m not the Marquis de Sade, I’m not even
Genesis P-Orridge. But I’ve always been kind of morbid. That’s why I love rock’n’roll -- it’s bad.
When things are bad aesthetically as well as morally -- there lies my
interest.”
Things starting going awry when Ariel was only two and his
parents got divorced. He went through therapy as a kid. After a period at a
Jewish private school, he attended a public junior high in Beverley Hills. The
transition was difficult. “Being very small, I was made fun of a lot.” So Ariel
got into death metal as a kind of retaliatory counter-strike. “There’s no question I was trying to
over-compensate for the fact that I was a little pipsqueak and completely
harmless, by listening to really aggressive music. Embracing something to
intimidate people. I decided I had to
get my revenge. I was like a Columbine kid, except this is before Columbine.
But there was that total pathos thing of using the craziest music to express my
extreme antipathy to normies. I wore Goreguts T shirts and I was like ‘why
don’t people want to talk me?’!”
Things improved after a sojourn at an American private
school in Mexico – the death-metal CDs were traded in for the less overtly
offensive miserabilism of The Cure and The Smiths. Still, a taste for the dark and
perverted manifested still through his
high school artwork, which had a “a grotesque quality - corpses, sculptures I made of human flesh.
Deep-gutted and disemboweled. All these terrible sadistic things happening to
them, charged with erotic or religious imagery.”
“Craft” is another
Jarrell-style keyword that flickers through Ariel’s conversation, with a palpable
pride in what he achieved on the most basic set-up. Listening, you can sense an
innocent Lego-like delight in song building, the deftness with which he strings
together intros, builds, middle-eights,
transitions, codas, into surprising but logical pop constructions.
Craftmanship is something that Ariel was praised for from a
very early age, albeit in the visual rather than sonic arts: the first time he can
remember receiving encouragement and attention. “From the age of three, I was
an extremely skilled craftsman,” he told me in 2010. “I was always raised to
think I was supposed to be an artist” – here he put on a squeaky old parent’s
voice - “’Oh my god, look at him, he’s like a Picasso’. They thought I
was going to go into graphic design.” But when he got to art school, he found
that his particular talent for illustration was out of synch with prevailing
conceptual approaches. That’s when the songwriting impulses of his pre-teen
years resurged, resulting in his presentation of CD-Rs sold from a kiosk as his
artistic contribution to the end-of-year thesis show at Cal Arts.
In his songs, two
stages of Ariel’s development - the
child’s awakening to the rapture of pure pop beauty, the adolescent’s angst and
bratty nihilism - mesh into art-pop that’s simultaneously classicist and
expressionist. The violence of emotion
is what gives Ariel’s work its charge, flooding the formalist pop structures
with raw feeling - like the virulent
hues of graffiti sprayed against the side of a building.
Disregarding whatever I've said about my views on this matter, do you have a solution to improving your mood on such disheartening artists? Are you condemning yourself to glumness? Or do you think the malaise will fade in time?
ReplyDeleteI'm reconciled to having mixed emotions stirred up by artists and artworks.
ReplyDeleteBut in some ways it's no different than the relationships with actual real people in your life. Maybe one is lucky enough to have a few absolutely unalloyed relationships. But usually there's some kind of negative aspect or something that sits alongside the aspects that make them loveable or admirable. A disagreement, a flaw, a hypocrisy - any number of things that you make allowances for and just accept as part of the whole package. (Just as one "accepts" one's own failings, misdeeds, etc, or brushes them out of the forefront of consciousness)
Another question of course is whether the artistic genius is some way inextricably bound up with the personality defects, the lopsidedness. So for instance I started watching a doc on Patricia Highsmith - and by most accounts, she was a pretty cold, unpleasant, misanthropic, sort of person. Capable of heartlessness. But this cold, dark worldview is what led to the Ripley novels etc.
Also the ability to disconnect from people and go into the imaginative space that generated the stories, is how writers do their work. Or any artist. But particularly writers - they often bad parents, bad siblings, bad friends - because they have to push people away in order to do their work. It's a solitary thing and you are choosing NOT to be with loved ones, to give your time to something else.
Artistic greatness and rampant selfishness, or self-centredness, do seem to go together.