VERSUS: THE
SCIENCE OF REMIXOLOGY
Pulse, 1995
by Simon Reynolds
Last year, two albums--"Muziq Vs The
Auteurs" and
Massive Attack V
Mad Professor's "No Protection"--won
critical plaudits
with their two different takes on the same
concept: a
reknowned remixer's drastic (per)versions of the
original artist's
material.
Massive Attack's languid trip hop is
deeply informed by
reggae and
sound-system culture, so it wasn't such a huge
leap for the band
to invite one of its heroes, UK dub
producer Mad Professor,
to rework the "Protection" album.
The Professor's
treatments, while often extreme,
were sublimely
sensitive to the spirit of Massive, and many
fans and critics
reckon "No Protection" superior to the album
proper. But tekno boffin Mike Paradinas of Muziq and
wordy
songsmith Luke
Haines of the Auteurs come from utterly
opposed aesthetic
universes. Haines' willingness to
subject his
finely honed rock-lit to Muziq's merciless
mutilation seems
masochistic (especially given
that Paradinas
has never concealed his contempt for the
material he had
to rework).
In both cases, it's the "versus" in the title that's
significant. . In
the early '80s, a remix meant an extended,
marginally more
dance-friendly version of a pop
song. But today, "remixing" usually means
creating
an almost
entirely new track which contains only tiny shards
and ghostly
traces of the original. It's now the norm for
remixers to
operate with an almost contemptous disregard for
the original
work; in turn, their clients give the remixers
licence to deface
and dismember. It's this adversarial
attitude on the
part of remixer towards remixee that the word
"versus"
evokes. Alluding to the reggae tradition of the 'soundclash'--a contest between
rival sound-systems--"versus' also chimes in with the
widely held
belief that dub pioneers like King Tubby and
Lee Perry are the
founding fathers of today's science of
"remixology"
"Versus" is the subtext of so much of the most
challenging and
vibrant musical activity of the mid-'90s.
In
the area of
"post-rock" experimentalism, the last two years
have seen a spate
of "remix" albums by bands like God, Scorn,
Main, Tortoise
and Ui, each featuring a gaggle of guest
remixers. Even Jon Spencer Blues' Explosion got in on
the
action with its
"Experimental Remixes" EP, wherein the
Explosion's
live'n'smokin' R&B got seriously studio-warped by
Moby, Dub
Narcotic Sound System, Wu Tang Clan's Genius,
U.N.K.L.E., and
Beck & the Beasties' Mike D.
You can also see the 'versus' concept lurking behind
John Oswald's "Grayfolded" (where
the plunderphonic
pioneer sampled
improvisatory material from 100 live versions
of the Grateful
Dead's "Dark Star", then wove it into a
seamless,
ultra-kosmik uber-jam); behind Stereolab's "Crumb Duck" EP (in
which the band's
playing was collaged and processed by
veteran
avant-gardist Steve Stapleton of Nurse With Wound); and behind
Faust's comeback
album "Rien", which was spliced together by experimentalist Jim
O'Rourke out of live recordings of the group's reunion tour of America from
a few years
earlier. O'Rourke is also working on a remix project for Mille Plateaux, where
he's using the Frankfurt-based label's entire avant-techno roster as source
material.
And all the above is before you even begin taking into account
entire genres of
contemporary dance music, like trip hop, house and
jungle, where the
simultaneous release of a bunch of barely
recognisable
remakes by several different remixers (four,
five, six, and
more!) is a common occurrence, and the "re-remix"
can prolong a
track's dancefloor currency to a year or longer.
Dance music has
its own 'remix albums' featuring guest producers, like trip-hopper DJ Food's
recent "Refried Food", or The Shamen's CD-worth of versions of the
same song, "Move Any Mountain". (One version consisted of
dissassembled components of the track, to enable the listener to construct
their own remix). Dance also has the 'remix tribute' album, where instead of
covering songs by the original artist (as in the rock tribute album), forgotten
innovators like Chris & Cosey or Yellow Magic Orchestra are 'honored' by
having their classics vandalised by their aesthetic progeny.
* * * * *
Ironically, one of the few places this kind of remix-mania
isn't the rage is
in Jamaica's dancehall reggae scene.
Ironically,
because Jamaica was where "versus" began. "King Tubby and Errol Thompson (Joe
Gibbs' engineer) were the first remixers", claims Steve Barrow, A&R
director of the reggae reissue label Blood & Fire and dub historian (he is
currently
co-authoring "The Rough Guide to Reggae", set for
'97 publication
by Penguin). "But dub didn't demolish the
original
completely, whereas today the remix is a complete
remake--say, just
a wisp of Mariah Carey's vocal over a
whole new rhythm
track. The ur-text of a dub is always
the
original vocal
version.
"At first dubs were just called 'instrumentals', then they
started calling
them 'versions'," Barrow continues.
"Gradually,
more effects were added --echo, thunderclap, etc-
-and dubs got
closer to what we now think of as a remix. By
1982 dub had run
its course in Jamaica, it had become a
formula. But that
was just at the point when dub techniques
were first being
picked up by disco producers and used in
remixes."
According to Barrow, the "versus" in Massive Attack V
Mad Professor is
a "take-off" of the "soundclash", an event where
sound-systems competed to attract the majority of the audience to its end
of the hall or
enclosure. "In the early days of
reggae, you
might have
Kilimanjaro Vs Jah Love Music. Most Jamaican
dances featured
just one sound, but in the ska days, you'd
get places where
loads of sounds would meet and compete.
There's always
been intense competition in Jamaica between
sound-systems--to
get the best, most exclusive records (a.k.a
dubplates), to
have the most powerful PA system, the best
sonic
effects. Cos that's the way to increase
patrons and
gate-money, and
to build up loyal followers".
Later, "versus" became a sort of free-floating buzzword,
as with albums by
Scientist (Overton Brown, a protege of King
Tubby).
"With, say, 'Scientist Vs Prince Jammy', that's just a
concept, to
recreate the old vibe. It's similar to the idea
of 'meets', as in
'King Tubby Meets The Aggrovators At the
Dub Station':
that phrase describes the economic relationship
between the
producer and the band, but in a more vibesy way.
It's just a more
exciting way of describing the record than
'this is King
Tubby working over a bunch of Bunny Lee
rhythms.'"
The current revival of "versus" has taken the word from
its original
context and used it to describe the modern ethos
of remixing, ie.
the remixer is paid handsomely for
mutilating, maiming
and mutating the client's original work
to the point of
utter unrecognisability. But dub still
comes into
play, in so far
as dub's bag of tricks -- dropping out the
voice and certain
instruments, extreme use of echo, reverb
and delay in
order to create an illusory spatiality, signal
processing, the
addition of sound-effects--have
been dramatically
expanded thanks to digital
recording and
mixing techniques.
The idea that early '70s dub is the origin of
remixology's
science of sound-mutation is fervently embraced
by Kevin Martin,
who put together the celebrated compilation
"Macro Dub
Infection" ("Compilation of the Year" in the Village
Voice's 1995
critics' poll). Drawing on artists as diverse as
New Kingdom, 4
Hero, Tricky, Tortoise and Laika,
"Macro Dub Infection"
tracks the
virus-like spread of dub ideas throughout '90s music culture,
contaminating
everything from hip hop and jungle to avant-techno
and post-rock.
Kevin Martin also leads not one but three experimental
bands, God, Ice
and Techno-Animal. God is one of a number of
English post-rock
outfits who've released "remix" albums. On
"Appeal To
Human Greed", God's jazz-core tumult is vivisected
and reassembled
by avant-garde kinsmen such as Bill Laswell
and My Bloody
Valentine's Kevin Shields. Drone-rockers Main
and hip hop noir
unit Scorn put out "Ligature" and "Ellipsis"
respectively,
long-players based on the same premise.
American
avant-rockers have followed suite: Tortoise with the
"Rhythms,
Resolutions & Clusters" mini-LP, while Tortoise's
ubiquitous
drummer/producer John McEntire is one of the guest
remixologists
featured on Ui's "Unlike" CD
Why is there so
much interest in
remixing? Is it just a knock-on effect of
rising interest
in club-based and post-rave musics, itself a
bored response to
the tired traditionalism of grunge'n'lo-fi
in America, and
Britpop in the UK? Or does it run a
little
deeper?
"People have lost respect for the heart of the song,"
argues
Martin. "The song is no longer
considered sacrosanct,
it's seen not as
a finite entity, but a set of resources that can be
endlessly adapted
and extended." Martin thinks this state of
affairs is way
cool. In fact, when he got Kevin Shields
to
rework a God
track, and hired jungle producers Spring Heel
Jack to remix
"Heavy Water" for Techno-Animal's "Babylon
Seeker" EP,
he "told them they could leave nothing of
the original if
they wanted. They were astounded!"
The subtext of "Macro Dub Infection", says Martin, is to
show "just
how important the processing and treatments have become in modern
music. It's
almost like musicians are accessories to the
process now. You've got people doing great work who lack
any
traditional
instrumental skills"--Martin means sampler-
wizards and
engineer/poets such as Tricky, Howie B,
jungle producers
like Dillinja--"because the sampling and sequencing
programmes
available enable them to rampage through the back
catalogue, the
canon of past music, and create great things."
Then there's relatively new technology like "hard disk
editing", of
which Martin is a big fan: digital software
whereby musical
information is chopped up, layered,
rearranged,
processed through effects, all within the
"virtual
space" of the computer, and to infinitesmal degrees
of
intricacy. What "hard disk
editing" and
sampling/sequencing
programmes like Cubase demonstrate is the
extent to which
the techniques of remixology have ceased to
be a supplement
to the original act of creativity. For better
or worse,
remixology has infected the process of music-making
itself, with the
result that there's no longer such a thing
as an 'definitive
version' or a primal moment of creation.
It also means
that "music has become a science, it's less
instinctive,"
admits Martin. (The invention of
wordprocessing
programs and the PC has had a similar effect on
creative
writing).
Ironically, Martin is only just embarking on his first
remix of
someone's else music (he's reworked God tracks in
the past). He's doing an Ice remix and Techno-Animal
remix
of the Palace
single "More Brother Rides", at the invitation
of the band's UK
label Domino.
"I'm toying with keeping some elements of the track,
'cos I like it,
but it is tempting to obliterate it totally.
I think the
Techno-Animal version is going to be more
devastating: I
want to make it robotic-sounding, so I'll
probably just
keep the vocal and highly process it. With the
Ice remix, I
mislaid the instrumental contributions by the
other members of Ice,
so--after panicking!-- I pitched down the vocal,
reversed the
bass-line and accentuated the rhythm by looping
certain
drum-fills. The idea is to turn a very cerebral song
into something
more physical and hypnotic. What
interests me
about this Palace
project is that it's the collision of state-of-art
studio techniques
with a simple, heartfelt song grounded in a
rootsy,
traditional genre.There's something about Will Oldham's
voice that made
me think of roots reggae singer Horace Andy,
and I'm into the
idea of playing on that, putting his nasal,
country voice
into a post-dub context, framing it with music
that's like a
hybrid of Mo' Wax-style trip hop and
PiL's "Metal
Box"."
Despite "Macro Dub Infection", Martin doesn't necessarily
agree with Steve
Barrow that Jamaica is the absolute and
undisputed origin
of remixology. Echo effects were being
explored up by
all kinds of artists in the psychedelic era,
from Miles Davis
to Yoko Ono and Can. Even before that,
Martin says, the
early '60s "English Phil Spector", Joe Meek, "was
doing weird mixes
of songs, while Brian Wilson was recording
peculiar
alternate takes. It's just that the record companies
wouldn't put them
out".
Dub's concept of the "soundclash" does, however,
inform Martin's
latest project "Techno-Animal Vs Reality",
which is soon to
be recorded for the Mille Plateaux label.
Five guest artists--ambient noir-ist Thomas
Koner,
trip-hopper DJ
Vadim, Sonic Boom (ex-Spacemen 3, currently of
E.A.R), New York
dub collective Word Sound, and ambient-
jungle producers
4 Hero--will supply Martin and his partner
Justin Broadrick
with "minimal material".
Techno-
Animal will then
add rhythm tracks. The results will be
handed back to
the guest artist, who will do a final version;
Techno-Animal
will also do its own version of each track.
As such,
"Techno-Animal Vs Reality" will combine the
antagonistic
aspect of "versus" and the collaborative
implications of
"meets".
* * * * * *
If remixology and dub-derived studio-as-instrument sorcery
have rejuvenated
left-field rock, there are times when you
have to wonder if
remix-mania hasn't gone too far. Is there perhaps a
case for a
neo-conservative stance on remixing: ie. that it's
time to bring
back remixes that enhance the original or bring out
hidden
possibilities, rather than dispense with the
blueprint
altogether?
As well as being a fad, you also have to wonder if
remixology isn't
just a giant scam some of the time. There's
a story, which
may or may not be apocryphal, concerning
Richard
"Aphex Twin" James--a highly sought-after remixer,
even though he's
infamous for obliterative revamps that bear
scant resemblance
to the original. Hired by a famous band's
record company to
do an overhaul, James
agreed, then
promptly forget all about the assignment. On the
appointed day, a
courier arrived chez Aphex to pick up the
DAT of the
remix. Initially taken aback, James
quickly
recovered his
composure and scuttled upstairs, rifled through
his massive
collection of demos and unfinished tracks, picked
one at random and
handed it to the messenger. Band and
record label both
professed themselves highly pleased with
his
reinterpretation!
True or not, many of Aphex's remixes might as well be
all-new
compositions. The scale of devastation is in ratio
to his estimation
of the band: Curve and Jesus Jones got
absolutely
decimated, Saint Etienne (of whom he said "I
think they're a
good pop group but I don't actually like
them, if you know
what I mean") got severely mutated, but
Seefeel got
loving, respectful treatment. For his gorgeous
remixes on that
band's "Time to Find Me", James retained most
of Seefeel's
original track, albeit considerably rearranged.
Recently, Aphex Twin has largely dropped out of the
remixing game
(although he did rework Gavin Bryars' "The
Sinking of the
Titanic", with mixed results). But
James'
buddy Luke
Vibert, a.k.a. Wagon Christ, has stepped
into the breech,
becoming one of the busiest, most in-demand
remixologists of
last year. Not only can he dish it out, he can take it too: witness the
brilliant Wagon Christ EP "Redone", which features an extremist
jungle
version of one
Vibert track by none other than Richard James.
Of all the genres of modern dance, jungle has taken remix-
mania the
furthest. As a result, jungle has a fluid, hazy-
round-the-edges
notion of authorship. Often, a track will be
popularly
attributed to its remixer; generally, remixes are
so dramatically
different from the originals that this seems
only just. One
example is Omni Trio's "Renegade Snares",
often regarded as
a Foul Play track, owing to their remix and
subsequent
"VIP" re-remix. Ironically, both versions are
examples of
sympathetic remixing at its best: each
dramatically
intensifies the thunder'n'joy of the original,
turbo-charging
the breakbeats while retaining the tracks'
hooks and melodic
refrains, albeit in shuffled order.
Appearing live,
Foul Play have
also been known to "play" their masterly
remix of Hyper-On
Experience's "Lords of the Null Lines" as
if it were their
own track (which in a sense, it is).
Jungle has introduced some new twists to remixology.
There's the
"VIP Remix" (basically a marketing buzzword), and
there's the
sequel, on which the original artist re-
interprets his
own work. Metalheads (the name Goldie
used to
operate under)
put out the "dark-side" classic "Terminator"
in late 1992,
then followed it up half-a-year later with
"Terminator
II". Such is the track's repute, a
full three
years on, that
"Terminator 3" is due out any week now,
confusingly
released via another alter-ego, Rufige Cru.
Goldie's ally Doc
Scott has just done the same thing to his
'92 classic
"Here Come The Drumz", which
has just been 'resurrected' in the
form of
"Drumz '95". Here, the only
remnant of the original,
barely
recognisable because of the extreme digital processing
bought to bear,
is a tiny fragment of Chuck D's vocal:
"drums!".
* * * * * *
Posing questions about authorship and attribution, remixing
also
problematises the notion of copyright. If, in the age of
"versus",
the remix is tantamount to an all-new track,
why should the
original artist get all the royalties? At the
moment, copyright
remains with the original artist, and the
remixer gets a
flat fee. (Sometimes artists will "swap"
remixes of each
others' work). But Kevin Martin says he can
"see it
getting to the point where percentage points are
added to the
contract, so that the remixer gets royalties.
Then again, in
jungle particularly, so much of the 'original'
music is
sample-based, that you could argue that neither the
artist nor the
remixer are 'creators' in the traditional
sense. It's more
the case that both the artist and the
remixer act as
'filters' for a sort of cultural flow".
In this vision, beats and riffs, textures and
atmospherics,
circulate in the sort of "data ocean" described
by David Toop in
his book "Ocean of Sound: Aether Talk, Ambient
Sound and
Imaginary Worlds". Creativity
operates on the
macro-level of
the entire genre, not the individual artist, a
phenomenon Brian
Eno calls "scenius", as opposed to "genius".
The deejay's role
in all this is acting as yet another filter
for the
information-flow (of course, in jungle and techno, most
"artists"
are also professional deejays). The turntable "selector"
constructs the
raw material of tracks into a meta-track, a
"journey"
for the listener, or, with less propulsive genres
like ambient, an
"environment".
"Some deejaying is already live remixing," says Kevin Martin. "Not just in the linking and layering together of different records, but in the use of
effects: deejays
have 'kill switches' that can drop out
entire
frequencies for periods, and some advanced decks have
sampling
equipment with two-second memory and an array of
sonic
processes."
In dance cultures like jungle, house and techno, the
"versus"
concept is not so important as another dub reggae
term,
"version". This was the idea of endlessly re-using the
same drum &
bass grooves as the basis for different songs,
so that you'd get
entire albums based around a particular
"riddim".
In the jungle scene, "version" has gone
haywire, fractal.
One particular breakbeat, called "Amen"
because it's
taken from a funk track by The Amen Brothers,
has featured in
over 2000 tracks and is still being chopped
up and
processed. Hundreds of tracks feature an
instantly
recognisable
hiccup --a sped-up snatch of James Brown yelling
"you're bad,
sister!"--as a convulsive percussive tic. A 21st
Century blend of
cyber-dub and digi-funk, jungle has set up
an
anarcho-communistic free-for-all in which (musical)
property is
theft. In this new world order, everybody is
"versioning"
everybody else, and music is about the
undeclared war of
all "versus" all.
DISCOGRAPHY
'Muziq Vs The
Auteurs' (Astralwerks)
Massive Attack V
Mad Professor -- 'No Protection' (Circa, UK
import)
King Tubby, The
Observer Allstars & The Aggrovators ---'King
Tubby's Special,
1973-1976' (Trojan)
*************************************
Faust -- 'Rien'
(Table of the Elements)
John Oswald --
'Grayfolded' (Swell/Artifact)
Stereolab/Nurse
With Wound -- 'Crumb EP' (Duophonic). One
track appears on
the Stereolab compilation "Refried
Ectoplasm".
*************************************
'Macro Dub
Infection, Volume One' (Caroline)
God-- 'Appeal To
Human Greed' (Big Cat)
Techno-Animal
--'Babylon Seeker' EP (Blue Angel Records)
Main ---
'Ligature' (Beggars Banquet)
Scorn --
'Ellipsis' (Scorn)
Tortoise
--'Rhythms, Resolutions & Clusters' (Thrill Jockey)
Jon Spencer Blues
Explosion ---'Experimental Remixes'
(Matador)
Ui-- 'Unlike:
Remixes Vol 1' (Lunamoth)
******************************************
Aphex Twin
Remixes:
--Seefeel's "pure, impure",
released in America as part of
'Polyfusia' (Too
Pure/Astralwerks)
--Saint Etienne's "Who Do You Think
Youre Are", on "Hobart
Paving" EP
(Heavenly)
--Gavin Bryars' "Raising the Titanic:
The Aphex Twin
Mixes"
(Point)
Wagon Christ
Remixes:
--remixes of RHC, Ruby and Project One on
"The Real Trip:
Further Self
Evident Truths" (Rising High USA)
--"Redone EP" (Rising High USA)
*****************************************************
Jungle, trip-hop
and house remixology:
---"Renegade
Snares (Foul Play VIP Re-Remix)", on Omni Trio's
"Music For
The Next Millenium" (Sm:)e Communications)
---"I Seen A
Man Die (4 Hero NW2 Gangsta Move)" and "4 Hero
Reinforced",
on Scarface's "I Seen A Man Die" EP (Virgin,
import)
---Remixes by
Wagon Christ, Autechre, Dr Rockit, Fila
Brazilia and
others on DJ Food's "Refried Food" (Ninja Tune)
---Green Velvet
"Flash Remixes" (Relief) --- 7 versions total on one double 12 inch
pack, and another three versions out in the UK too! Is this a record?
No comments:
Post a Comment