THEY BURN SO BRIGHT WHILST YOU CAN ONLY WONDER WHY: WATCHING
FIORRUCI MADE ME HARDCORE
text for the Mark Leckey retrospective at the Serpentine Gallery, 2001
by Simon Reynolds
There are a number of angles from which you could watch Mark
Leckey's extraordinary Fiorucci Made Me
Hardcore. There's the anthropological view, which would see the footage of
U.K. dance scenes as not so much subcultures as cults: upsurges of the
sacred within an otherwise brutally disenchanted and secularized
post-industrial Britain, mystical youth tribes each organized around an array
of fetishes, totems and rites. Such an analysis might zoom in on the parallels
between Sufi whirling dervishes and the twirling dancers at Northern Soul
temple Wigan Casino: the same defiance of gravity and weightless levitation
above the mundane. Or it might note the messianic fervour of sayings like
Northern Soul's "Keep the Faith" or rave's "Hardcore Will Never
Die".
Another potential
prism for Fiorucci is subcultural
theory, the Marxism-influenced school of "resistance through rituals"
research that emerged in Britain during the 1970s. Here the focus would less be
on transcendence than on what was being transcended: the alchemical synergy of style, music and
drugs as a "solution" to the
impasses of the class system, a jamming of symbolic codes that achieved a kind
of victory over the fate otherwise laid out for these working class youths, while at the same
time diverting them from pursuing a real and permanent solution to their
problems through political activity.
Other readings could draw draw on more recent and trendier
theories. For instance, a
Lacan/Kristeva/Bataille
analysis that would be more, well, analytic, in the Freudian sense, drawing on on notions like "drive" and the
"acephalic" in order to draw out the elements of repetition and
regression in these drugs-and-dance cults, with their fixated trances and autistic-seeming
bodily movements of rocking, shaking and twitching. Or perhaps a cybernetic approach, influenced
equally by Deleuze & Guattari, Brian Eno, and Kodwo Eshun, and examining these subcultures in terms of
machinic energy, the feedback loops of "scenius", the generation of
posthuman intensities, and so forth.
All these angles have
their strengths and virtues; all make
visible certain aspects of Northern Soul, the Casuals, and Hardcore Rave (the
three separate but linked subcultures that Fiorucci
works with) while inevitably obscuring others. My own reading would probably touch on all
of these already mentioned at various points but would betray a pronounced
slant towards paradox, looking at the
way these cults are dedicated to beauty and elegance yet so often produce
grotesquerie and indignity, or at how these movements based around perpetual
motion seem to find their truest essence in moments of stasis, frozen poses,
tableaux. I expect that I would find myself drawn irresistibly towards
oxymoronic formulations: the dance
subculture as an exit that becomes a dead end,
offering transcendence that turns into a trap, achieving a triumph that
is simultaneously a form of defeat. And so forth...
But there's something a little too neat and tidy about these
formulations... a faint taint of
smugness, which may well be unavoidable but still feels inadequate. All these different ways of dissecting/contextualizing/
historicizing the strange subcultural blooms of a Britain that has disappeared never
to return.... all of them, however well-intended, serve ultimately to explain away and domesticate these unassimilable phenomena. In so
far as they successfully translate these cults into other terms (the
jargons of particular discourses and disciplines) such readings deflect you
from the singular power of Leckey's artwork: its reality, the fact that it is
made almost entirely of salvaged documentary footage. Now obviously the material has been processed:
it's been selected out of a much larger
mass, it's been juxtaposed and sequenced and altered in various ways (mostly within the
domain of time and speed--slowing down, freeze-framing). The footage fragments
have also been severed from whatever original audio track they possessed and
given a new one (a remarkable piece of sound art in its own right). But despite this working up of the material,
in a certain crucial way the ultimate effect is of an artist who doesn't get in
the way of the raw material, out of respect.
What comes across, overwhelmingly, is the palpable reality of what you
are looking at, in all its absurdity, monstrosity and glory. There is an opacity to the found material, an
insistent but mute materiality: limb-dislocating contortions, foetus-pale
flesh, eyes vacant in trance or stiletto-sharp with vigilant pride, maniacal smiles that split apart the dead grey
mask of English "mustn't
grumble" mundanity, faces
disfigured with bliss...
At times, the sensation of watching Fiorucci borders on
invasive: obscene not in the porno sense (staged, graphic, every detail exposed
by the bright light) but obscene as in the more murky and partial view of the
peeping tom or eavesdropper. It can
feel, at times, a little like what looking at videos covertly taken of people
masturbating might look like: their expressions and sounds and fantasy murmurings. You sometimes think: this should really never
have been filmed, these moments should really never have been captured, these
are secrets that should really never have been shown.
Because all this really happened. This is how some young people actually spent their time, this is the thing to which they devoted all their energy and money and passion and life-force. Mark Leckey has pieced together a kind of shrine made up of sacred relics, fragments of nights that the participants may barely remember. Image debris from a time in their lives that they might conceivably regret, for any number of reasons, or, perhaps worse, might regret because that time is long gone, is passed and past.
What you are witnessing--what Mark Leckey is re-presenting here almost without comment-- is a collection of what may have been the best moments from a number of young British lives in the last three decades of the 20th Century. Their finest hour.
Because all this really happened. This is how some young people actually spent their time, this is the thing to which they devoted all their energy and money and passion and life-force. Mark Leckey has pieced together a kind of shrine made up of sacred relics, fragments of nights that the participants may barely remember. Image debris from a time in their lives that they might conceivably regret, for any number of reasons, or, perhaps worse, might regret because that time is long gone, is passed and past.
What you are witnessing--what Mark Leckey is re-presenting here almost without comment-- is a collection of what may have been the best moments from a number of young British lives in the last three decades of the 20th Century. Their finest hour.